Opening this view
Preparing the latest Consultariat data and controls.
Preparing the latest Consultariat data and controls.
This recipient is categorized as a campaign service provider based on the spending pattern. Open transactions to see what work the campaign reported.
NWF STRATEGIES
2026 cycle · updated Sep 16, 2026 · figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending.
NWF STRATEGIES is the largest strategy consulting recipient in AK Senate in 2026 among campaign-service payees in the loaded FEC file.
Shared recipient — not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
6 counted rows from the loaded FEC file.
Story amounts sum current, spend-counted, race-assigned FEC disbursements in one cycle among current candidates. loaded-FEC-not-universe: figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending. shared-recipient-not-coordination: a shared recipient is not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
Payers are campaigns and committees on the source disbursements, not proof of a consulting engagement.
No payers in this group.
No payers in this group.
| Date | Campaign | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | PELTOLA, MARY | PHONEBANKING SERVICES | $12,000 |
| 2026-05-01 | PELTOLA, MARY | PHONEBANKING SERVICES | $12,000 |
| 2026-04-09 | PELTOLA, MARY | PHONEBANKING SERVICES | $16,000 |
| 2026-04-01 | PELTOLA, MARY | POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING | $10,000 |
| 2026-03-13 | PELTOLA, MARY | POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING | $12,000 |
| 2026-02-04 | PELTOLA, MARY | POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING | $37,500 |
No payers in this group.
No counted payments match the current filters.
This recipient is categorized as a campaign service provider based on the spending pattern. Open transactions to see what work the campaign reported.
NWF STRATEGIES
2026 cycle · updated Sep 16, 2026 · figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending.
NWF STRATEGIES is the largest strategy consulting recipient in AK Senate in 2026 among campaign-service payees in the loaded FEC file.
Shared recipient — not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
6 counted rows from the loaded FEC file.
Story amounts sum current, spend-counted, race-assigned FEC disbursements in one cycle among current candidates. loaded-FEC-not-universe: figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending. shared-recipient-not-coordination: a shared recipient is not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
Upgrade to review historical direct-client and outside-spending outcome evidence.
Payers are campaigns and committees on the source disbursements, not proof of a consulting engagement.
| Date | Campaign | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-01 | PELTOLA, MARY | PHONEBANKING SERVICES | $12,000 |
| 2026-05-01 | PELTOLA, MARY | PHONEBANKING SERVICES | $12,000 |
| 2026-04-09 | PELTOLA, MARY | PHONEBANKING SERVICES | $16,000 |
| 2026-04-01 | PELTOLA, MARY | POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING | $10,000 |
| 2026-03-13 | PELTOLA, MARY | POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING | $12,000 |
| 2026-02-04 | PELTOLA, MARY | POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING | $37,500 |
| Race | Largest candidate link | Spend | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-S-AK-00 S · AK-00 · rating n/a | PELTOLA, MARY Direct client · DEM · $99,500 | $99,500 | 6 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-PA-12 H · PA-12 · rating n/a | LEE, SUMMER Direct client · DEM · $92,125 | $92,125 | 21 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-NJ-11 H · NJ-11 · rating n/a | MEJIA, ANALILIA Direct client · DEM · $78,906 | $78,906 | 10 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-VA-01 H · VA-01 · rating n/a | KNAPP, JASON Direct client · DEM · $73,304 | $73,304 | 6 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-NY-07 H · NY-07 · rating n/a | VALDEZ, CLAIRE Direct client · DEM · $69,658 | $69,658 | 8 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-IL-03 H · IL-03 · rating n/a | RAMIREZ, DELIA Direct client · DEM · $60,493 | $60,493 | 20 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-AR-02 H · AR-02 · rating n/a | JONES, CHRIS Direct client · DEM · $54,900 | $54,900 | 8 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-MI-13 H · MI-13 · rating n/a | MCKINNEY, DONAVAN Direct client · DEM · $50,289 | $50,289 | 15 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-FL-00 S · FL-00 · rating n/a | MUJICA, HECTOR DANIEL Direct client · DEM · $39,965 | $39,965 | 6 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-IL-08 H · IL-08 · rating n/a | AHMED, JUNAID Direct client · DEM · $28,500 | $28,500 | 7 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-MI-00 S · MI-00 · rating n/a | EL-SAYED, ABDUL Direct client · DEM · $27,200 | $27,200 | 8 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-MN-00 S · MN-00 · rating n/a | FLANAGAN, MARGARET Direct client · DFL · $23,900 | $23,900 | 9 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-IL-02 H · IL-02 · rating n/a | PETERS, ROBERT JAMES Direct client · DEM · $20,500 | $20,500 | 5 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-MA-06 H · MA-06 · rating n/a | ANDRES-BECK, BETH Direct client · DEM · $15,000 | $15,000 | 2 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-PA-03 H · PA-03 · rating n/a | RABB, CHRISTOPHER M. Direct client · DEM · $12,400 | $12,400 | 3 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CA-32 H · CA-32 · rating n/a | AHUJA, CHRISTOPHER Direct client · DEM · $8,178 | $8,178 | 7 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-NJ-08 H · NJ-08 · rating n/a | ALI, MUSSAB Direct client · DEM · $4,500 | $4,500 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-SC-01 H · SC-01 · rating n/a | DEFORD, WILLIAM MAC Direct client · DEM · $4,500 | $4,500 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CA-22 H · CA-22 · rating n/a | VILLEGAS, RANDY Direct client · DEM · $3,500 | $3,500 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-MO-03 H · MO-03 · rating n/a | MANN, BETHANY EILEEN Direct client · DEM · $3,500 | $3,500 | 3 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-NY-15 H · NY-15 · rating n/a | NEMORIN, DALOURNY Direct client · DEM · $3,500 | $3,500 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-ME-00 S · ME-00 · rating n/a | RODRIGUEZ, DAIRA Direct client · DEM · $3,500 | $3,500 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-FL-02 H · FL-02 · rating n/a | BARNES, BRICE Direct client · DEM · $3,309 | $3,309 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CA-34 H · CA-34 · rating n/a | GONZALES-TORRES, ANGELA Direct client · DEM · $1,000 | $1,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| Payer | Payer Type | Spend | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate campaign | $99,500 | 6 | |
| Candidate campaign | $92,125 | 21 | |
| Candidate campaign | $78,906 | 10 | |
| Candidate campaign | $73,304 | 6 | |
| Candidate campaign | $69,658 | 8 | |
| Candidate campaign | $60,493 | 20 | |
| Candidate campaign | $54,900 | 8 | |
| Candidate campaign | $50,289 | 15 | |
| Candidate campaign | $39,965 | 6 | |
| Candidate campaign | $28,500 | 7 | |
| Candidate campaign | $27,200 | 8 | |
| Candidate campaign | $23,900 | 9 | |
| Candidate campaign | $20,500 | 5 | |
| Candidate campaign | $15,000 | 2 | |
| Candidate campaign | $12,400 | 3 | |
| Candidate campaign | $8,178 | 7 | |
| Candidate campaign | $4,500 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $4,500 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $3,500 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $3,500 | 3 | |
| Candidate campaign | $3,500 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $3,500 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $3,309 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $1,000 | 1 |
No shared party payment rows match the current filters.
| Month | Spend | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | $4,500 | 1 |
| Feb 2025 | $6,000 | 2 |
| Mar 2025 | $6,000 | 2 |
| Apr 2025 | $16,251 | 5 |
| May 2025 | $15,000 | 4 |
| Jun 2025 | $14,000 | 5 |
| Jul 2025 | $29,569 | 10 |
| Aug 2025 | $24,586 | 7 |
| Sep 2025 | $22,920 | 7 |
| Oct 2025 | $39,759 | 11 |
| Nov 2025 | $24,900 | 9 |
| Dec 2025 | $32,400 | 7 |
| Jan 2026 | $86,204 | 12 |
| Feb 2026 | $121,360 | 15 |
| Mar 2026 | $72,103 | 15 |
| Apr 2026 | $95,800 | 13 |
| May 2026 | $101,540 | 14 |
| Jun 2026 | $69,236 | 12 |
| Jul 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Nov 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Dec 2026 | $0 | 0 |
No payers in this group.
No payers in this group.
| Date | Payer / Client | Purpose | Category | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-22 | VILLEGAS, RANDY VILLEGAS FOR CONGRESS | FUNDRAISING | Unclear / other | $3,500 |