Opening this view
Preparing the latest Consultariat data and controls.
Preparing the latest Consultariat data and controls.
This recipient is categorized as a campaign service provider based on the spending pattern. Open transactions to see what work the campaign reported.
CAMPAIGN HQ
2026 cycle · updated Sep 16, 2026 · figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending.
CAMPAIGN HQ is the largest texting phones recipient in NY-21 in 2026 among campaign-service payees in the loaded FEC file.
Shared recipient — not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
5 counted rows from the loaded FEC file.
| Date | Campaign | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-22 |
Story amounts sum current, spend-counted, race-assigned FEC disbursements in one cycle among current candidates. loaded-FEC-not-universe: figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending. shared-recipient-not-coordination: a shared recipient is not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
Payers are campaigns and committees on the source disbursements, not proof of a consulting engagement.
No payers in this group.
No payers in this group.
| CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS |
| PHONE BANKS |
| $64,732 |
| 2026-06-19 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS | PHONE BANKS | $56,075 |
| 2026-06-15 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS | PHONE BANKS | $5,958 |
| 2026-06-10 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS | PHONE BANKS | $34,133 |
| 2026-06-03 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS | POLLING | $56,976 |
No payers in this group.
No counted payments match the current filters.
This recipient is categorized as a campaign service provider based on the spending pattern. Open transactions to see what work the campaign reported.
CAMPAIGN HQ
2026 cycle · updated Sep 16, 2026 · figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending.
CAMPAIGN HQ is the largest texting phones recipient in NY-21 in 2026 among campaign-service payees in the loaded FEC file.
Shared recipient — not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
5 counted rows from the loaded FEC file.
| Date | Campaign | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-22 |
Story amounts sum current, spend-counted, race-assigned FEC disbursements in one cycle among current candidates. loaded-FEC-not-universe: figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending. shared-recipient-not-coordination: a shared recipient is not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
Upgrade to review historical direct-client and outside-spending outcome evidence.
Payers are campaigns and committees on the source disbursements, not proof of a consulting engagement.
| CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS |
| PHONE BANKS |
| $64,732 |
| 2026-06-19 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS | PHONE BANKS | $56,075 |
| 2026-06-15 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS | PHONE BANKS | $5,958 |
| 2026-06-10 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS | PHONE BANKS | $34,133 |
| 2026-06-03 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS | POLLING | $56,976 |
| Race | Largest candidate link | Spend | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-H-NY-21 H · NY-21 · rating n/a | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS Direct client · REP · $217,875 | $217,875 | 5 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-SC-00 S · SC-00 · rating n/a | GRAHAM, LINDSEY O. Direct client · REP · $118,096 | $118,096 | 4 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-TX-32 H · TX-32 · rating n/a | BONDAR, PAUL Direct client · REP · $86,253 | $86,253 | 9 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-TX-00 S · TX-00 · rating n/a | CORNYN, JOHN SEN Direct client · REP · $19,175 | $19,175 | 2 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-TX-35 H · TX-35 · rating n/a | LUJAN, JOHN Direct client · REP · $6,880 | $6,880 | 2 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-TN-07 H · TN-07 · rating n/a | BARRETT, JOSEPH MICHAEL Direct client · REP · $5,000 | $5,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-MS-00 S · MS-00 · rating n/a | HYDE-SMITH, CINDY Direct client · REP · $541 | $541 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| Payer | Payer Type | Spend | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate campaign | $217,875 | 5 | |
| Candidate campaign | $118,096 | 4 | |
| Candidate campaign | $86,253 | 9 | |
| Candidate campaign | $19,175 | 2 | |
| Candidate campaign | $6,880 | 2 | |
| Candidate campaign | $5,000 | 1 | |
| Committee | $3,500 | 6 | |
| Candidate campaign | $541 | 1 |
| Month | Spend | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | $541 | 1 |
| Feb 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Apr 2025 | $500 | 1 |
| May 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | $25,888 | 3 |
| Jul 2025 | $55,176 | 1 |
| Aug 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | $500 | 1 |
| Oct 2025 | $5,000 | 1 |
| Nov 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Jan 2026 | $13,300 | 3 |
| Feb 2026 | $73,703 | 7 |
| Mar 2026 | $250 | 1 |
| Apr 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| May 2026 | $26,055 | 4 |
| Jun 2026 | $256,406 | 7 |
| Jul 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Nov 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Dec 2026 | $0 | 0 |
No payers in this group.
| Date | Payer / Client | Purpose | Category | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-22 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS CONSTANTINO FOR CONGRESS, INC. | PHONE BANKS | Texting/phones | $64,732 |
| 2026-06-19 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS CONSTANTINO FOR CONGRESS, INC. | PHONE BANKS | Texting/phones | $56,075 |
| 2026-06-16 | NRCC | SOFTWARE | Software/platforms | $500 |
| 2026-06-15 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS CONSTANTINO FOR CONGRESS, INC. | PHONE BANKS | Texting/phones | $5,958 |
| 2026-06-10 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS CONSTANTINO FOR CONGRESS, INC. | PHONE BANKS | Texting/phones | $34,133 |
| 2026-06-05 | GRAHAM, LINDSEY O. TEAM GRAHAM, INC. | TELE-TOWNHALL SERVICES | Unclear / other | $38,032 |
| 2026-06-03 | CONSTANTINO, ANTHONY THOMAS CONSTANTINO FOR CONGRESS, INC. | POLLING | Polling/research | $56,976 |
| 2026-05-20 | LUJAN, JOHN JOHN LUJAN FOR CONGRESS | SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION | Software/platforms | $250 |