2026-04-30
CASSIDY, WILLIAM M.
SURVEY RESEARCH
$32,000
Working
ConsultariatFollow campaign spending
Opening this view
Preparing the latest Consultariat data and controls.
Preparing the latest Consultariat data and controls.
This recipient is categorized as a campaign service provider based on the spending pattern. Open transactions to see what work the campaign reported.
PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES
2026 cycle · updated Sep 16, 2026 · figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending.
PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES is the largest strategy consulting recipient in LA Senate in 2026 among campaign-service payees in the loaded FEC file.
Shared recipient — not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
6 counted rows from the loaded FEC file.
Story amounts sum current, spend-counted, race-assigned FEC disbursements in one cycle among current candidates. loaded-FEC-not-universe: figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending. shared-recipient-not-coordination: a shared recipient is not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
Payers are campaigns and committees on the source disbursements, not proof of a consulting engagement.
No payers in this group.
No payers in this group.
| Date | Campaign | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $32,000 |
| 2026-04-15 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $46,000 |
| 2026-04-01 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $49,000 |
| 2026-03-12 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $55,000 |
| 2026-03-09 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $70,000 |
| 2026-02-05 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $76,000 |
No payers in this group.
No counted payments match the current filters.
This recipient is categorized as a campaign service provider based on the spending pattern. Open transactions to see what work the campaign reported.
PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES
2026 cycle · updated Sep 16, 2026 · figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending.
PUBLIC OPINION STRATEGIES is the largest strategy consulting recipient in LA Senate in 2026 among campaign-service payees in the loaded FEC file.
Shared recipient — not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
6 counted rows from the loaded FEC file.
Story amounts sum current, spend-counted, race-assigned FEC disbursements in one cycle among current candidates. loaded-FEC-not-universe: figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending. shared-recipient-not-coordination: a shared recipient is not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
Upgrade to review historical direct-client and outside-spending outcome evidence.
Payers are campaigns and committees on the source disbursements, not proof of a consulting engagement.
| Date | Campaign | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $32,000 |
| 2026-04-15 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $46,000 |
| 2026-04-01 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $49,000 |
| 2026-03-12 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $55,000 |
| 2026-03-09 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $70,000 |
| 2026-02-05 | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. | SURVEY RESEARCH | $76,000 |
| Race | Largest candidate link | Spend | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-S-LA-00 S · LA-00 · rating n/a | CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. Direct client · REP · $328,000 | $328,000 | 6 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CA-40 H · CA-40 · rating n/a | KIM, YOUNG Direct client · REP · $160,000 | $160,000 | 4 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CA-06 H · CA-06 · rating n/a | KILEY, KEVIN Direct client · REP · $153,000 | $153,000 | 3 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-TX-23 H · TX-23 · rating n/a | GONZALES, ERNEST ANTHONY TONY II Direct client · REP · $71,000 | $71,000 | 2 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-AZ-06 H · AZ-06 · rating n/a | CISCOMANI, JUAN Direct client · REP · $66,500 | $66,500 | 2 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-IA-01 H · IA-01 · rating n/a | MILLER-MEEKS, MARIANNETTE JANE Direct client · REP · $65,000 | $65,000 | 3 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-LA-01 H · LA-01 · rating n/a | SCALISE, STEVE MR Direct client · REP · $60,000 | $60,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-OK-01 H · OK-01 · rating n/a | BUTTERFIELD, NATHANIEL ALLEN Direct client · REP · $58,000 | $58,000 | 2 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CA-01 H · CA-01 · rating n/a | GALLAGHER, JAMES Direct client · REP · $51,900 | $51,900 | 3 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-SD-00 S · SD-00 · rating n/a | ROUNDS, MIKE Direct client · REP · $44,000 | $44,000 | 2 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CA-13 H · CA-13 · rating n/a | LINCOLN, KEVIN J II Direct client · REP · $43,500 | $43,500 | 2 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-IN-06 H · IN-06 · rating n/a | SHREVE, JEFFERSON Direct client · REP · $42,000 | $42,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CO-05 H · CO-05 · rating n/a | CRANK, JEFF Direct client · REP · $37,000 | $37,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CA-48 H · CA-48 · rating n/a | ISSA, DARRELL Direct client · REP · $36,500 | $36,500 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-AL-02 H · AL-02 · rating n/a | MARQUES, RHETT Direct client · REP · $34,000 | $34,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-PA-01 H · PA-01 · rating n/a | FITZPATRICK, BRIAN Direct client · REP · $30,000 | $30,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-TX-27 H · TX-27 · rating n/a | CLOUD, MICHAEL Direct client · REP · $28,000 | $28,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-CO-08 H · CO-08 · rating n/a | EVANS, TIMOTHY GABRIEL JOSEPH Direct client · REP · $25,050 | $25,050 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-TN-07 H · TN-07 · rating n/a | FOLEY, MASON Direct client · REP · $15,000 | $15,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-OH-09 H · OH-09 · rating n/a | MERRIN, DEREK Direct client · REP · $10,000 | $10,000 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| Payer | Payer Type | Spend | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate campaign | $328,000 | 6 | |
| Committee | $306,852 | 11 | |
| Candidate campaign | $160,000 | 4 | |
| Candidate campaign | $153,000 | 3 | |
| Candidate campaign | $71,000 | 2 | |
| Candidate campaign | $66,500 | 2 | |
| Candidate campaign | $65,000 | 3 | |
| Candidate campaign | $60,000 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $58,000 | 2 | |
| Candidate campaign | $51,900 | 3 | |
| Candidate campaign | $44,000 | 2 | |
| Candidate campaign | $43,500 | 2 | |
| Candidate campaign | $42,000 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $37,000 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $36,500 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $34,000 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $30,000 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $28,000 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $25,050 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $15,000 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $10,000 | 1 |
| Candidate | National | Why | Candidate Spend | National Spend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASSIDY, WILLIAM M. REP · S-LA-00 | NRCC | Signal 50 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $250K | $328,000 | $306,852 |
| KIM, YOUNG REP · H-CA-40 | NRCC | Signal 42 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $160,000 | $306,852 |
| KILEY, KEVIN REP · H-CA-03 | NRCC | Signal 42 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $153,000 | $306,852 |
| GONZALES, ERNEST ANTHONY TONY II REP · H-TX-23 | NRCC | Signal 42 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $71,000 | $306,852 |
| CISCOMANI, JUAN REP · H-AZ-06 | NRCC | Signal 42 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $66,500 | $306,852 |
| MILLER-MEEKS, MARIANNETTE JANE REP · H-IA-01 | NRCC | Signal 42 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $65,000 | $306,852 |
| SCALISE, STEVE MR REP · H-LA-01 | NRCC | Signal 42 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $60,000 | $306,852 |
| BUTTERFIELD, NATHANIEL ALLEN REP · H-OK-01 | NRCC | Signal 42 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $58,000 | $306,852 |
| GALLAGHER, JAMES REP · H-CA-01 | NRCC | Signal 42 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $51,900 | $306,852 |
| ROUNDS, MIKE REP · S-SD-00 | NRCC | Signal 36 National committee spend with this vendor is above $250K | $44,000 | $306,852 |
| LINCOLN, KEVIN J II REP · H-CA-13 | NRCC | Signal 36 National committee spend with this vendor is above $250K | $43,500 | $306,852 |
| SHREVE, JEFFERSON REP · H-IN-06 | NRCC | Signal 36 National committee spend with this vendor is above $250K | $42,000 | $306,852 |
| Month | Spend | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | $40,000 | 2 |
| Apr 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | $53,269 | 1 |
| Jul 2025 | $19,000 | 1 |
| Aug 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | $120,500 | 4 |
| Oct 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | $59,633 | 2 |
| Jan 2026 | $103,500 | 2 |
| Feb 2026 | $243,000 | 7 |
| Mar 2026 | $159,000 | 3 |
| Apr 2026 | $326,000 | 8 |
| May 2026 | $355,400 | 14 |
| Jun 2026 | $186,000 | 6 |
| Jul 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Nov 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Dec 2026 | $0 | 0 |
No payers in this group.
| Date | Payer / Client | Purpose | Category | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 | NRCC | SURVEY RESEARCH | Polling/research | $25,000 |
| 2026-06-12 | KILEY, KEVIN KEVIN KILEY FOR CONGRESS | POLLING | Polling/research | $62,000 |
| 2026-06-12 | NRCC | SURVEY RESEARCH | Polling/research | $20,500 |
| 2026-06-11 | FITZPATRICK, BRIAN BRIAN FITZPATRICK FOR ALL OF US | POLLING | Polling/research | $30,000 |
| 2026-06-09 |
| BUTTERFIELD, NATHANIEL ALLEN FRIENDS OF NATHAN BUTTERFIELD 2026 |
| POLLING |
| Polling/research |
| $28,000 |
| 2026-06-02 | CISCOMANI, JUAN CISCOMANI FOR CONGRESS | POLLING | Polling/research | $20,500 |
| 2026-05-29 | NRCC | SURVEY RESEARCH | Polling/research | $38,500 |
| 2026-05-25 | GALLAGHER, JAMES GALLAGHER FOR CONGRESS | CALIFORNIA CD-1 SURVEY | Polling/research | $24,000 |