Opening this view
Preparing the latest Consultariat data and controls.
Preparing the latest Consultariat data and controls.
This recipient is categorized as a campaign service provider based on the spending pattern. Open transactions to see what work the campaign reported.
HONEY FOX STRATEGIES
2026 cycle · updated Sep 16, 2026 · figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending.
HONEY FOX STRATEGIES is the largest strategy consulting recipient in TX-26 in 2026 among campaign-service payees in the loaded FEC file.
Shared recipient — not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
8 counted rows from the loaded FEC file.
Story amounts sum current, spend-counted, race-assigned FEC disbursements in one cycle among current candidates. loaded-FEC-not-universe: figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending. shared-recipient-not-coordination: a shared recipient is not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
Payers are campaigns and committees on the source disbursements, not proof of a consulting engagement.
No payers in this group.
| Date | Campaign | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $5 |
| 2026-06-29 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $1 |
| 2026-06-26 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $989 |
| 2026-06-25 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $1,260 |
| 2026-06-24 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $1,956 |
| 2026-06-23 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $38 |
| 2026-06-22 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $1,212 |
| 2026-06-18 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $369 |
No payers in this group.
No payers in this group.
No counted payments match the current filters.
This recipient is categorized as a campaign service provider based on the spending pattern. Open transactions to see what work the campaign reported.
HONEY FOX STRATEGIES
2026 cycle · updated Sep 16, 2026 · figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending.
HONEY FOX STRATEGIES is the largest strategy consulting recipient in TX-26 in 2026 among campaign-service payees in the loaded FEC file.
Shared recipient — not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
8 counted rows from the loaded FEC file.
Story amounts sum current, spend-counted, race-assigned FEC disbursements in one cycle among current candidates. loaded-FEC-not-universe: figures describe the currently loaded FEC file, not the universe of political spending. shared-recipient-not-coordination: a shared recipient is not proof of coordination, a consulting relationship, or effectiveness.
Upgrade to review historical direct-client and outside-spending outcome evidence.
Payers are campaigns and committees on the source disbursements, not proof of a consulting engagement.
| Date | Campaign | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-30 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $5 |
| 2026-06-29 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $1 |
| 2026-06-26 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $989 |
| 2026-06-25 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $1,260 |
| 2026-06-24 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $1,956 |
| 2026-06-23 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $38 |
| 2026-06-22 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $1,212 |
| 2026-06-18 | GILL, BRANDON | FUNDRAISING FEES | $369 |
| Race | Largest candidate link | Spend | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-H-TX-26 H · TX-26 · rating n/a | GILL, BRANDON Direct client · REP · $62,519 | $62,519 | 86 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-TX-34 H · TX-34 · rating n/a | FLORES, ERIC Direct client · REP · $13,530 | $13,530 | 6 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-IA-04 H · IA-04 · rating n/a | RHODES, RYAN Direct client · REP · $9,171 | $9,171 | 23 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-LA-06 H · LA-06 · rating n/a | MIGUEZ, BLAKE Direct client · REP · $8,147 | $8,147 | 14 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-MN-05 H · MN-05 · rating n/a | NAGEL, JOHN Direct client · REP · $7,305 | $7,305 | 14 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-LA-00 S · LA-00 · rating n/a | LETLOW, JULIA Direct client · REP · $3,471 | $3,471 | 1 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-H-KY-01 H · KY-01 · rating n/a | COMER, JAMES Direct client · REP · $2,663 | $2,663 | 4 tx 1 candidates |
| 2026-S-GA-00 S · GA-00 · rating n/a | DOOLEY, DEREK Direct client · REP · $574 | $574 | 2 tx 1 candidates |
| Payer | Payer Type | Spend | Transactions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Committee | $108,877 | 4 | |
| Candidate campaign | $9,171 | 23 | |
| Candidate campaign | $7,305 | 14 | |
| Candidate campaign | $3,471 | 1 | |
| Candidate campaign | $739 | 11 |
| Candidate | National | Why | Candidate Spend | National Spend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GILL, BRANDON REP · H-TX-26 | NRCC | Signal 37 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $62,519 | $108,877 |
| GILL, BRANDON REP · H-TX-26 | NRSC | Signal 37 Candidate spend with overlapping vendor is above $50K | $62,519 | $83,924 |
| FLORES, ERIC REP · H-TX-34 | NRCC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $13,530 | $108,877 |
| FLORES, ERIC REP · H-TX-34 | NRSC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $13,530 | $83,924 |
| RHODES, RYAN REP · H-IA-04 | NRCC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $9,171 | $108,877 |
| RHODES, RYAN REP · H-IA-04 | NRSC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $9,171 | $83,924 |
| MIGUEZ, BLAKE REP · H-LA-06 | NRCC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $8,147 | $108,877 |
| MIGUEZ, BLAKE REP · H-LA-06 | NRSC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $8,147 | $83,924 |
| NAGEL, JOHN REP · H-MN-05 | NRCC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $7,305 | $108,877 |
| NAGEL, JOHN REP · H-MN-05 | NRSC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $7,305 | $83,924 |
| LETLOW, JULIA REP · S-LA-00 | NRCC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $3,471 | $108,877 |
| LETLOW, JULIA REP · S-LA-00 | NRSC | Signal 31 Campaign-service recipient type: strategy_consulting | $3,471 | $83,924 |
| Month | Spend | Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Feb 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Mar 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Apr 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| May 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Jun 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Jul 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Aug 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Sep 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Oct 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | $0 | 0 |
| Dec 2025 | $10,640 | 12 |
| Jan 2026 | $3,048 | 6 |
| Feb 2026 | $2,429 | 9 |
| Mar 2026 | $308 | 4 |
| Apr 2026 | $25,150 | 7 |
| May 2026 | $32,940 | 7 |
| Jun 2026 | $55,046 | 8 |
| Jul 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Aug 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Oct 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Nov 2026 | $0 | 0 |
| Dec 2026 | $0 | 0 |
No payers in this group.
| Date | Payer / Client | Purpose | Category | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-29 | SCOTT, RICK SEN RICK SCOTT FOR FLORIDA | LIST RENTAL | Lists/data | $4 |
| 2026-06-29 | RHODES, RYAN RHODES FOR IOWA | CHARGEBACK OF DIGITAL FUNDRAISING COMMISSION & LIST RENTAL REVENUE SHARE | Lists/data | -$47 |
| 2026-06-25 | NRCC | LIST RENTAL | Lists/data | $1,461 |
| 2026-06-12 | NRCC | LIST RENTAL | Lists/data | $50,000 |
| 2026-06-08 | SCOTT, RICK SEN RICK SCOTT FOR FLORIDA | LIST RENTAL | Lists/data | $2 |
| 2026-06-07 | LETLOW, JULIA JULIA LETLOW FOR LOUISIANA | DIGITAL FUNDRAISING COMMISSION & LIST RENTAL REVENUE SHARE | Lists/data | $3,471 |
| 2026-06-06 | SCOTT, RICK SEN RICK SCOTT FOR FLORIDA | LIST RENTAL | Lists/data | $67 |
| 2026-06-01 | RHODES, RYAN RHODES FOR IOWA | DIGITAL FUNDRAISING COMMISSION & LIST RENTAL REVENUE SHARE | Lists/data | $88 |